The detailed study of Eurasian ornamental forms was begun by Alois
Riegl in his formalist study Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu
einer Geschichte der Ornamentik (Problems of style: foundations for a
history of ornament) of 1893, who in the process developed his
influential concept of the Kunstwollen. Riegl traced formalistic
continuity and development in decorative plant forms from Ancient
Egyptian art and other ancient Near Eastern civilizations through the
classical world to the arabesque of Islamic art; while the
Kunstwollen has few followers today, his basic analysis of the
development of forms has been confirmed and refined by the wider
corpus of examples known today. Jessica Rawson has recently extended
the analysis to cover Chinese art, which Riegl did not cover, tracing
many elements of Chinese decoration back to the same tradition; the
shared background helping to make the assimilation of Chinese motifs
into Persian art after the Mongol invasion harmonious and productive.
Styles of ornamentation can be studied in reference to the specific
culture which developed unique forms of decoration, or modified
ornament from other cultures. The Ancient Egyptian culture is
arguably the first civilization to add pure decoration to their
buildings. Their ornament takes the forms of the natural world in
that climate, decorating the capitals of columns and walls with
images of papyrus and palm trees. Assyrian culture produced ornament
which shows influence from Egyptian sources and a number of original
themes, including figures of plants and animals of the region.
Ancient Greek civilization created many new forms of ornament, with
regional variations from Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian groups. The
Romans Latinized the pure forms of the Greek ornament and adapted the
forms to every purpose.From the 15th to the 19th century, "Pattern
books" were published in Europe which gave access to decorative
elements, eventually including those recorded from cultures all over
the world. Andrea Palladio's I quattro libri dell'architettura (Four
Books on Architecture) (Venice, 1570. which included both drawings of
classical Roman buildings and renderings of Palladio's own designs
utilizing those motifs, became the most influential book ever written
on architecture. Napoleon had the great pyramids and temples of Egypt
documented in the Description de l'Egypte (1809). Owen Jones
published The Grammar of Ornament in 1856 with colored illustrations
of decoration from Egypt, Turkey, Sicily and Spain. He took residence
in the Alhambra Palace to make drawings and plaster castings of the
ornate details. Interest in classical architecture was also fueled by
the tradition of traveling on The Grand Tour, and by translation of
early literature about architecture in the work of Vitruvius and
Michelangelo. During the 19th century, the acceptable use of
ornament, and its precise definition became the source of aesthetic
controversy in academic Western architecture, as architects and their
critics searched for a suitable style. "The great question is,"
Thomas Leverton Donaldson asked in 1847, "are we to have an
architecture of our period, a distinct, individual, palpable style of
the 19th century?".1849, when Matthew Digby Wyatt viewed the
French Industrial Exposition set up on the Champs-Elysées in Paris,
he disapproved in recognizably modern terms of the plaster ornaments
in faux-bronze and faux woodgrain: Both internally and externally
there is a good deal of tasteless and unprofitable ornament... If
each simple material had been allowed to tell its own tale, and the
lines of the construction so arranged as to conduce to a sentiment of
grandeur, the qualities of "power" and "truth,"
which its enormous extent must have necessarily ensured, could have
scarcely fail to excite admiration, and that at a very considerable
saving of expense.Contacts with other cultures through colonialism
and the new discoveries of archaeology expanded the repertory of
ornament available to revivalists. After about 1880, photography made
details of ornament even more widely available than prints had done.
No comments:
Post a Comment